The HeKatE Case Loan

Eliasz Kańtoch, Tomasz Michalski

original by sradzik

Description

This is an example of a system which computes cutomer's credit rating. It takes into account a few parameters describing customer status and computes his status in two stages. Firstly it does a preliminary check using customer's base financial parameters and if he passes this test his financial status will be analyzed more thoroughly.

Conceptualization

Vocabulary

  • Customer - A loan debtor
  • Loan - A type of dept, a sum of money lent at interest
  • Credit rating - An estimate of the amount of credit that can be extended to a company or person without undue risk
  • Monthly income - Average value of customer's monthly income
  • Mortgage loan - A loan secured by a mortgage
  • Instalment - Amount of money payed back every month

Original Rules

Analysis

Examination of customer's credit rating begin with checking if his income multiplied by a certain coefficient is higher than his monthly instalments. Modeling this inequality in HeKatE methodology requires computing both sides of this inequality and comparing them in next table. If that condition is met, control should be passed to another system. Additional checks will be performed there, taking into account additional customer data. Empty cells in decision table will not have influence on the final decision.

Conceptual model design starts with Loan attribute. It is finalized to four conceptual attributes and one phisical - debtRec. This attribute is system output (final credit rating). On level 2 we can see that debtRec directly depends on IncVal and LoanReq. IncVal represents customer data needed to check inequality CusDa and loan data LoanDa. Attribute LoanReq contains informations necessary to final veryfication of customer's credit rading. Level 3 and 4 finalizes all conceptual attributes together with all relations between them.

Comparing XTT table prototype with XTT logic model we can see some differences. Tables created from LoanDa and CusDa conceptual attributes were merged into one table. It happend because both tables were used to compute value of single inequality. Unfortunatelly there is no possibility to design ARD diagram in such way that there will be two attributes on action side.

Table, where both sides of inequality are compared was also modified. In order to compare two attributes one of them must be in table header, second - written in table cell with its operator.

Conceptual design

General Conceptual Design

Directed Conceptual Design

Full ARD Model

Diagrams design in VARADA: loan-model.pl

The full hierarchical diagram is presented below:

ARD diagram:

TPH diagram:

The full hierarchical diagram generated by HQed:

Refined Conceptual Design

Physical Attribute Specification

Name Type Scope Comment
amount float [0; inf] loan value
creditCardBalance float - balance of credit card
debtRec enumerate {high; mid; low} credit rating
educationLoanBalance float [0; inf] balance of educational credit
incValRes bool {true; false} result of preliminary check
internalAnalystOpinion enumerate {high; mid; low} opinion of internal analyst
internalCreditRating enumerate {a; b; c; d; e; f} internal customer's credit rating
loanHolder bool {true; false} true if customer has other debts
monthlyDebt float - current monthly instalment
montlyIncome float [0; inf] monnthly income
mortageHolder bool {true; false} true if customer has mortage
outsideCreditScore integer [100; 900] external customer's credit rating
preCust float - attribute necessary to compute inequality
preQual float - attribute necessary to compute inequality
term integer [0; inf] number of instalments

Structuralization

XTT diagram generated by VARDA:

Logical design

FIXME

Design made by HQed xttml model:

pl/miw/2009/piw09_hades_1/hekate_case_loan.txt · ostatnio zmienione: 2017/07/17 08:08 (edycja zewnętrzna)
www.chimeric.de Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki do yourself a favour and use a real browser - get firefox!! Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0