Różnice między wybraną wersją a wersją aktualną.
| Both sides previous revision Poprzednia wersja Nowa wersja | Poprzednia wersja | ||
|
pl:dydaktyka:dss:lab4 [2017/11/22 08:44] kkluza [Simulation of a laboratory model] |
pl:dydaktyka:dss:lab4 [2019/06/27 15:50] (aktualna) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Linia 69: | Linia 69: | ||
| {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:onecase2.jpg?direct&600|}} | {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:onecase2.jpg?direct&600|}} | ||
| - | In the case of this simulation, there is no need to skip further tasks and flows. In case of tasks, it is done automatically, but in the case of flows, it is possible to manually select the path on the gate, and if we do not do it within the time set by the clock (1), the selection will be drawn according to the probabilities defined in the scenario. On the left, there is a panel (2) showing the current cost and execution time of the process instance, resource usage time, and bottleneck if it has been detected so far. On the other hand, when we run the next run, we get the result of the last run. | + | In the case of this simulation, there is no need to skip further tasks and flows. In case of tasks, it is done automatically. In the case of sequence flows, it is possible to manually select the path on the gate, and if we do not do this within the time set by the clock (1), the selection will be drawn according to the probabilities defined in the scenario. On the left, there is a panel (2) showing the current cost and execution time of the process instance, resource usage time, and bottleneck if it has been detected so far. On the other hand, when we run the next run, we get the result of the last run. |
| {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:onecase3.jpg?direct&600|}} | {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:onecase3.jpg?direct&600|}} | ||
| Linia 80: | Linia 80: | ||
| {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:multiple3.jpg?direct&600|}} | {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:multiple3.jpg?direct&600|}} | ||
| - | You can also see how many requests for a business trip have been finalized as rejected (1) or accepted (2) and generat a simulation report (3). | + | You can also see how many requests for a business trip have been finalized as rejected (1) or accepted (2) and generate a simulation report (3). |
| {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:multiple4.jpg?direct&600|}} | {{:pl:dydaktyka:bim:lab3_2014:multiple4.jpg?direct&600|}} | ||
| Linia 86: | Linia 86: | ||
| ====== Assignment ====== | ====== Assignment ====== | ||
| - | ===== Simulation of a model for the assignment ===== | + | ===== Simulation of the travel request model ===== |
| Please perform the multiple case simulation several times following the described scenario for the duration: 30 days. | Please perform the multiple case simulation several times following the described scenario for the duration: 30 days. | ||
| Linia 95: | Linia 95: | ||
| ===== Model optimization ===== | ===== Model optimization ===== | ||
| - | Using the tools to simulate and considering the development of the company should consider the improvement of the process. | + | Considering the need for company development, using the tools to simulate the process, propose the improvement of the process. |
| Please suggest possible solutions to improve the process, taking into account the following assumptions: | Please suggest possible solutions to improve the process, taking into account the following assumptions: | ||
| * The frequency of the "Travel request submitted" event will increase to 100 times per week. | * The frequency of the "Travel request submitted" event will increase to 100 times per week. | ||
| - | * The company may employ 1 additional person with a salary of 20€/hour. | + | * The company may employ one additional person with a salary of 20€/hour. |
| * In the company you can transfer funds up to 10% for each resource. | * In the company you can transfer funds up to 10% for each resource. | ||
| - | * The company may propose changes in the number of human resources and their working time (as far as possible, these should be cautious decisions, as employees do not perform only this process, in particular, the Management Board will reluctantly attempt to change the number of employees who do basic work in company in other processes). | + | * You can propose the changes in the number of human resources and their working time (as far as possible, these should be cautious decisions, as employees do not perform only this process). In particular, the company board will reluctantly attempt to change the number of employees who work in other processes. |
| - | * The company may propose process changes, in particular: | + | * You may also propose other process changes, e.g.: |
| * assignments of tasks (but it must be justified that it is possible and appropriate), | * assignments of tasks (but it must be justified that it is possible and appropriate), | ||
| - | * break up tasks into smaller ones or groupings into larger ones, the total time for such grouped tasks must be the same as the original ones). | + | * break up tasks into smaller ones or grouping some tasks into larger ones, but the total time for such a grouped task must be the same as the sum of times of the original ones. |
| - | The resulting process should have minimized bottlenecks, \\ | + | The bottlenecks in the process should be minimized i.e. |
| - | i.e. it must be possible to run the simulation for a minimum of 90 days. | + | it must be possible to run the simulation for a minimum of 90 days. |
| - | ^ In the group report, you should propose the appropriate changes along with the justification to the board of the company ^ | + | ^ In the group report for the board of the company, you should propose the appropriate changes along with the justification ^ |
| The report should include a systematic description of the proposed changes with justification: | The report should include a systematic description of the proposed changes with justification: | ||
| * the reason for the change (resulting from the simulation analysis before the change); | * the reason for the change (resulting from the simulation analysis before the change); | ||
| - | * the anticipated effects of the change (which will improve); | + | * the anticipated effects of the change (what will be improved); |
| - | * the above items should be backed up by the corresponding screenshots of the simulation or simulation report; | + | * provide the appropriate screenshots (from simulation or the simulation report) for the items mentioned above; |
| - | * you can include relevant graphs illustrating the scope of improvement of various process parameters with the changes introduced. | + | * you can include relevant charts/graphs illustrating the scope of improvement of various process parameters with the changes introduced. |
| - | ** The report should be convincing and understandable to a person who \\ | + | ** The report should be convincing and understandable to a person who does not know the tools for process simulation. ** |
| - | does not know the tools for process simulation. ** | + | |
| Max. report length is 5 pages A4 :!: | Max. report length is 5 pages A4 :!: | ||
| - | Report as attachments (separate files): | + | As the attachments to the report please send (separate files): |
| * the models, | * the models, | ||
| - | * the list of necessary simulation parameters for each model (or screenshots with parameters) so that the simulation can be repeated, | + | * the list of necessary simulation parameters for each model (or screenshots with these parameters) so that the simulation can be repeated, |
| * the automatically generated report from the simulation in Signavio. | * the automatically generated report from the simulation in Signavio. | ||
